- To: Peter Baumann <p.baumann@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Support for projections (was GALEON WCS testing on DataFed)
- From: Gerry Creager <gerry.creager@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 15:25:09 -0600
As much as I'd like to see this enforced, I have to agree with you at
this stage. I think we're 18-24 months from seeing a reprojection
standard for WCS at this point especially considering the varying
degrees of agility of software development and deployment.
gerry Peter Baumann wrote:
IMHO we'll have to live with the fact that some servers may offer coverages not "compatible" with others, in the extreme case even across the same server. I wouldn't enforce by standard that a server does reprojection on coverages.feel free to flame me... ;-) -Peter
Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager@xxxxxxxx Texas Mesonet -- AATLT, Texas A&M University Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.847.8578 Pager: 979.228.0173 Office: 903A Eller Bldg, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
- References:
- telecon for OGC GALEON session
- From: Ben Domenico
- Re: GALEON WCS testing on DataFed
- From: John Caron
- Re: Support for projections (was GALEON WCS testing on DataFed)
- From: John Caron
- Re: Support for projections (was GALEON WCS testing on DataFed)
- From: Peter Baumann
- telecon for OGC GALEON session