- To: "patrick" <patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Robert P Dale" <rdale@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
- From: "Robert Mullenax" <Robert.Mullenax@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 16:45:38 -0500
Well..you missed out on that one. It's a fact..and I attended AMS Annual meeting papers on it. I will forward info. -----Original Message----- From: patrick [mailto:patrick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wed 4/2/2008 4:31 PM To: Robert Mullenax; Robert P Dale; ldm-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement > and the GEMPAK replacement will be Java based it's a reasonable > assumption.. what's all this talk about a gempak replacement, and God forbid a java based one? gempak has always been based upon n-awips... of course if they are switching over it's likely why chiz really left.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
- From: Robert Mullenax
 
 
- Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
- References:
- [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
- From: Robert Mullenax
 
- Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
- From: Robert P Dale
 
- Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
- From: Robert Mullenax
 
- Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
- From: Robert P Dale
 
- Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
- From: Robert Mullenax
 
- Re: [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement
- From: patrick
 
 
- [ldm-users] Windows and LDM replacement