- To: Tom Whittaker <tomw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: text versions for using the NSDL Communication Portal
- From: Ben Domenico <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 07:59:01 -0600
The only problem I have with HTML is with the particular flavor generated
by Microsoft Word and PowerPoint. Actually the newer (Mac) version seems
to do a better job, but Word 2000 generates impenetrable HTML. Those are
the cases where we prefer to create PDFs. We're looking into whether Word
XP does a better job of creating web pages.
-- Ben--On Tuesday, May 14, 2002 8:16 AM -0500 Tom Whittaker <tomw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Even better, in my opinion, would be HTML... tom On Mon, 13 May 2002, Ben Domenico wrote:Another alternative that works for us is PDF if you have a full version of Acrobat to create it. You can't edit it, but you do get the pictures and the nice layout. -- Ben --On Monday, May 13, 2002 1:15 PM -0500 Christopher Klaus <klaus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Thanks for pointing that out! I just submitted text versions of the > word documents. While lacking nice pictures, they retain the > information for using these capabilities. > > Hope this helps, > Chris >-- Tom Whittaker University of Wisconsin-Madison Space Science and Eng. Center ph: 608.262.2759
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: text versions for using the NSDL Communication Portal
- From: Tom Whittaker
- Re: text versions for using the NSDL Communication Portal
- From: Ted Habermann
- Re: text versions for using the NSDL Communication Portal
- References:
- Re: text versions for using the NSDL Communication Portal
- From: Tom Whittaker
- Re: text versions for using the NSDL Communication Portal